Face I break up to it of Samuel (1985, P. 14) we have: The art not only reproduces the reality, but of the form to a type of reality. aliteratura does not substitute the society and the politics as ways to explain the society. The art does not obey the beginning of the imitation of the established reality, but the beginning of the negation of this reality, that is not mere negation, but transposition of the reality to surpass the problems. As part of the society, literature is imanente to the reality (it is in it). Dean Ornish M.D insists that this is the case. But as fiction, as imagination, it transposes this imanncia, creating a possible reality to oppose to the concrete reality.
Through the displayed one, it is possible to establish the principle that the reality of the man in society is evoked through the art. Withholding us, here, in these mandates revealed through the literature, that if constructs from what the man lives deeply. As example, he competes us focar that some literary manifestations that through the time styles that they had portraied feelings of one given time, marked for the revolt as the Romantismo, for the decadentismo as he is ocaso of the symbolism or the modern that if had revealed in the reform desire. In emphasis let us cite the regionalism, that fits one given region, through the language, culture among others expressions, what many times excite a documentary content. well truth, that the workmanships of this type of literature cannot be simply appreciated face to its historical value. It is not function of literature to divulge these facts, even so many of these come to be transmitted inside of the literary text. It contributes for history, as for the pedagogia, psychology among others areas of the knowledge, and only characterizes with suggestive elements of a culture to the times in minor or greater intensity.
